Paper detail

New bounds for $k$-means and information $k$-means

In this paper, we derive a new dimension-free non-asymptotic upper bound for the quadratic $k$-means excess risk related to the quantization of an i.i.d sample in a separable Hilbert space. We improve the bound of order $\mathcal{O} \bigl( k / \sqrt{n} \bigr)$ of Biau, Devroye and Lugosi, recovering the rate $\sqrt{k/n}$ that has already been proved by Fefferman, Mitter, and Narayanan and by Klochkov, Kroshnin and Zhivotovskiy but with worse log factors and constants. More precisely, we bound the mean excess risk of an empirical minimizer by the explicit upper bound $16 B^2 \log(n/k) \sqrt{k \log(k) / n}$, in the bounded case when $\mathbb{P}( \lVert X \rVert \leq B) = 1$. This is essentially optimal up to logarithmic factors since a lower bound of order $\mathcal{O} \bigl( \sqrt{k^{1 - 4/d}/n} \bigr)$ is known in dimension $d$. Our technique of proof is based on the linearization of the $k$-means criterion through a kernel trick and on PAC-Bayesian inequalities. To get a $1 / \sqrt{n}$ speed, we introduce a new PAC-Bayesian chaining method replacing the concept of $δ$-net with the perturbation of the parameter by an infinite dimensional Gaussian process. In the meantime, we embed the usual $k$-means criterion into a broader family built upon the Kullback divergence and its underlying properties. This results in a new algorithm that we named information $k$-means, well suited to the clustering of bags of words. Based on considerations from information theory, we also introduce a new bounded $k$-means criterion that uses a scale parameter but satisfies a generalization bound that does not require any boundedness or even integrability conditions on the sample. We describe the counterpart of Lloyd's algorithm and prove generalization bounds for these new $k$-means criteria.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.