Paper detail

New Approaches to Identify Gene-by-Gene Interactions in Genome Wide Association Studies

Genetic variants identified to date by genome-wide association studies only explain a small fraction of total heritability. Gene-by-gene interaction is one important potential source of unexplained heritability. In the first part of this dissertation, a novel approach to detect such interactions is proposed. This approach utilizes penalized regression and sparse estimation principles, and incorporates outside biological knowledge through a network-based penalty. The method is tested on simulated data under various scenarios. Simulations show that with reasonable outside biological knowledge, the new method performs noticeably better than current stage-wise strategies, especially when the marginal strength of main effects is weak. The proposed method is designed for single-cohort analyses. However, it is generally acknowledged that only multi-cohort analyses have sufficient power to uncover genes and gene-by-gene interactions with moderate effects on traits, such as likely underlie complex diseases. Multi-cohort, meta-analysis approaches for penalized regressions are developed and investigated in the second part of this dissertation. Specifically, I propose two different ways of utilizing data-splitting principles in multi-cohort settings and develop three procedures to conduct meta-analysis. Using the method developed in the first part of this dissertation as an example of penalized regressions, three proposed meta-analysis procedures are compared to mega-analysis using a simulation study. The results suggest that the best approach is to split the participating cohorts into two groups. In the last part of this dissertation, the novel method developed in the first part is applied to the Framingham Heart Study measures on total plasma Immunoglobulin E (IgE) concentrations, C-reactive protein levels, and Fasting Glucose.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.