Paper detail

New Approaches in designing a Zeeman-Slower

We present two new approaches for the design of a Zeeman-Slower, which rely on optimal compliance with the adiabatic following condition and are applicable to a wide variety of systems. The first approach is an analytical one, based on the assumption that the noise in the system is position independent. When compared with the traditional approach, which requires constant deceleration, for a typical system, we show an improvement of $\sim$ 10% in the maximal capture velocity, allowing for a larger slower acceptance, or a reduction of $sim$ 25% in slower length, allowing for a simpler design and a better collimated beam. The second approach relies on an optimization of a system in which the magnetic field and the noise profile are well known. As an example, we use our 12-coil modular design and show an improvement of $sim$ 9% in maximal capture velocity or, alternatively, a reduction of $\sim$ 33% in slower length as compared with the traditional approach.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.