Paper detail

Neutron Diffraction Measurements and First Principles Study of Thermal Motion of Atoms in Select M_{n+1}AX_n and Binary MX Transition Metal Carbide Phases

Herein, we compare the thermal vibrations of atoms in select ternary carbides with the formula Mn+1AXn ("MAX phases," M = Ti, Cr; A = Al, Si, Ge; X = C, N) as determined from first principles phonon calculations to those obtained from high-temperature neutron powder diffraction studies. The transition metal carbides TiC, TaC, and WC are also studied to test our methodology on simpler carbides. Good qualitative and quantitative agreement is found between predicted and experimental values for the binary carbides. For all the MAX phases studied - Ti3SiC2, Ti3GeC2, Ti2AlN, Cr2GeC and Ti4AlN3 - density functional theory calculations predict that the A element vibrates with the highest amplitude and does so anisotropically with a higher amplitude within the basal plane, which is in line with earlier results from high-temperature neutron diffraction studies. In some cases, there are quantitative differences in the absolute values between the theoretical and experimental atomic displacement parameters, such as reversal of anisotropy or a systematic offset of temperature-dependent atomic displacement parameters. The mode-dependent Grüneisen parameters are also computed to explore the anharmonicity in the system.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.