Paper detail

Neutrino Oscillations and Other Key Issues in Supersymmetric SU(4)_c \times SU(2)_L \times$ SU(2)_R

We try to gain an understanding of the recent Superkamiokande data on neutrino oscillations and several other important phenomenological issues within the framework of supersymmetric $SU(4)_c \times SU(2)_L \times SU(2)_R$ ($\equiv G_{422}$). By supplementing $G_{422}$ with a U(1)-${\cal R}$ symmetry, we can provide an explanation of the magnitude $M_G$ ($\sim 10^{16}$ GeV) of the $G_{422}$- symmetry breaking scale, resolve the MSSM $μ$ problem, and understand why proton decay has not been seen ($τ_p \gg 10^{34}$ yr). The family dependent ${\cal R}$ - symmetry also helps provide an explanation of the charged fermion mass hierarchies as well as the magnitudes of the CKM matrix elements. Several additional heavy states in the mass range $10^4-10^7$ GeV are predicted, and the MSSM parameter $\tan β$ turns out to be of order unity. The atmospheric neutrino problem is explained through $ν_μ-ν_τ$ mixing with $\sin^2 2θ_{μτ}\simeq 1$. The resolution of the solar neutrino puzzle is via the small angle MSW oscillations and necessarily requires a sterile neutrino $ν_s$ which, thanks to the ${\cal R}$ - symmetry, has a tiny mass.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.