Paper detail

Neutrino mass matrix in Anti-GUT with see-saw mechanism

We have investigated the predictions of neutrino oscillations within extended Anti-GUT, based on a large gauge group - the Standard Model and an B-L abelian group assumed with separate gauge fields coupling to each family of quarks and leptons. We take into account corrections concerning a crude way of accounting for the number of ways the vacuum expectation values of the Higgs fields of the model can be ordered in the Feynman diagrams yielding the mass matrix elements. Performing these corrections in a balanced way between the charged fermion sector and the neutrino sector (case I) leads to the previous version of our model that was a fit to the MSW small angle solution region. The fit considered here is marginally worse that the previous fit inasmuch as it predicts a somewhat lower solar neutrino mass square difference (which might though be the only way of avoiding the day-night exclusion region). The other two versions (case II and case III) are characterised by the heaviest of the see-saw neutrino matrix elements that are composed either of ν_{Rμ} and ν_{Rτ} or two ν_{Rτ}. These cases II and III fit the small mixing angle MSW scenario very well.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.