Paper detail

Neutrino Magnetic Moment Behaviour in a Renormalizable Model

We have shown in hep-ph/9608266 that a neutrino magnetic moment form factor $μ_ν (q^2)$ could be considerably amplified at low momentum transfer,$q^2 \leq m_N^2$, at the cost of introducing an extra light neutral fermion $N$ with mass $m_N$ and nonzero magnetic moment. It was assumed that the magnetic moment of $N$ would originate in a renormalizable way at a heavy scale $M$. While the enhancement of the neutrino magnetic moment was unambiguous, we stressed that in this effective Lagrangian approach an uncertainty persisted about the behaviour of $μ_ν (q^2)$ in the interval $m_N^2 \ll q^2 \ll M^2$. This is not unexpected in presence of a nonrenormalizable effective theory (a particle with bare magnetic moment). We show in a simple renormalizable model for the magnetic moment of particle $N$ how a 2 loop calculation solves the ambiguity. In the domain $m_N^2 \ll q^2 \ll M^2$ we confirm the result obtained in hep-ph/9608266 using a sharp cut-off. It is amusing that the correct results are given, as expected, through dimensional regularization in the full theory, but not in the effective lagrangian approach.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.