Abstract

We unify kernel density estimation\textit{kernel density estimation} and empirical Bayes\textit{empirical Bayes} and address a set of problems in unsupervised learning with a geometric interpretation of those methods, rooted in the concentration of measure\textit{concentration of measure} phenomenon. Kernel density is viewed symbolically as X⇀YX\rightharpoonup Y where the random variable XX is smoothed to Y=X+N(0,σ2Id)Y= X+N(0,σ^2 I_d), and empirical Bayes is the machinery to denoise in a least-squares sense, which we express as X↽YX \leftharpoondown Y. A learning objective is derived by combining these two, symbolically captured by X⇌YX \rightleftharpoons Y. Crucially, instead of using the original nonparametric estimators, we parametrize the energy function\textit{the energy function} with a neural network denoted by ϕϕ; at optimality, ∇ϕ≈−∇log⁡f\nabla ϕ\approx -\nabla \log f where ff is the density of YY. The optimization problem is abstracted as interactions of high-dimensional spheres which emerge due to the concentration of isotropic gaussians. We introduce two algorithmic frameworks based on this machinery: (i) a "walk-jump" sampling scheme that combines Langevin MCMC (walks) and empirical Bayes (jumps), and (ii) a probabilistic framework for associative memory\textit{associative memory}, called NEBULA, defined à la Hopfield by the gradient flow\textit{gradient flow} of the learned energy to a set of attractors. We finish the paper by reporting the emergence of very rich "creative memories" as attractors of NEBULA for highly-overlapping spheres.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.