Paper detail

Near-Optimal Stochastic Threshold Group Testing

We formulate and analyze a stochastic threshold group testing problem motivated by biological applications. Here a set of $n$ items contains a subset of $d \ll n$ defective items. Subsets (pools) of the $n$ items are tested -- the test outcomes are negative, positive, or stochastic (negative or positive with certain probabilities that might depend on the number of defectives being tested in the pool), depending on whether the number of defective items in the pool being tested are fewer than the {\it lower threshold} $l$, greater than the {\it upper threshold} $u$, or in between. The goal of a {\it stochastic threshold group testing} scheme is to identify the set of $d$ defective items via a "small" number of such tests. In the regime that $l = o(d)$ we present schemes that are computationally feasible to design and implement, and require near-optimal number of tests (significantly improving on existing schemes). Our schemes are robust to a variety of models for probabilistic threshold group testing.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.