Paper detail

Near-Optimal Scheduling in the Congested Clique

This paper provides three nearly-optimal algorithms for scheduling $t$ jobs in the $\mathsf{CLIQUE}$ model. First, we present a deterministic scheduling algorithm that runs in $O(\mathsf{GlobalCongestion} + \mathsf{dilation})$ rounds for jobs that are sufficiently efficient in terms of their memory. The $\mathsf{dilation}$ is the maximum round complexity of any of the given jobs, and the $\mathsf{GlobalCongestion}$ is the total number of messages in all jobs divided by the per-round bandwidth of $n^2$ of the $\mathsf{CLIQUE}$ model. Both are inherent lower bounds for any scheduling algorithm. Then, we present a randomized scheduling algorithm which runs $t$ jobs in $O(\mathsf{GlobalCongestion} + \mathsf{dilation}\cdot\log{n}+t)$ rounds and only requires that inputs and outputs do not exceed $O(n\log n)$ bits per node, which is met by, e.g., almost all graph problems. Lastly, we adjust the \emph{random-delay-based} scheduling algorithm [Ghaffari, PODC'15] from the $\mathsf{CLIQUE}$ model and obtain an algorithm that schedules any $t$ jobs in $O(t / n + \mathsf{LocalCongestion} + \mathsf{dilation}\cdot\log{n})$ rounds, where the $\mathsf{LocalCongestion}$ relates to the congestion at a single node of the $\mathsf{CLIQUE}$. We compare this algorithm to the previous approaches and show their benefit. We schedule the set of jobs on-the-fly, without a priori knowledge of its parameters or the communication patterns of the jobs. In light of the inherent lower bounds, all of our algorithms are nearly-optimal. We exemplify the power of our algorithms by analyzing the message complexity of the state-of-the-art MIS protocol [Ghaffari, Gouleakis, Konrad, Mitrovic and Rubinfeld, PODC'18], and we show that we can solve $t$ instances of MIS in $O(t + \log\logΔ\log{n})$ rounds, that is, in $O(1)$ amortized time, for $t\geq \log\logΔ\log{n}$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.