Paper detail

Near field asymptotic behavior for the porous medium equation on the half-line

Kamin and Vázquez proved in 1991 that solutions to the Cauchy-Dirichlet problem for the porous medium equation $u_t=(u^m)_{xx}$ on the half line with zero boundary data and nonnegative compactly supported integrable initial data behave for large times as a dipole type solution to the equation having the same first moment as the initial data, with an error which is $o(t^{-1/m})$. However, on sets of the form $0<x<g(t)$, with $g(t)=o(t^{1/(2m)})$ as $t\to\infty$, in the so called near field, the dipole solution is $o(t^{-1/m})$, and their result does not give neither the right rate of decay of the solution, nor a nontrivial asymptotic profile. In this paper we will show that the error is $o\big(t^{-(2m+1)/(2m^2)}(1+x)^{1/m}\big)$. This allows in particular to obtain a nontrivial asymptotic profile in the near field limit, which is a multiple of $x^{1/m}$, thus improving in this scale the results of Kamin and Vázquez.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.