Paper detail

Natural Gas Flow Solvers using Convex Relaxation

The vast infrastructure development, gas flow dynamics, and complex interdependence of gas with electric power networks call for advanced computational tools. Solving the equations relating gas injections to pressures and pipeline flows lies at the heart of natural gas network (NGN) operation, yet existing solvers require careful initialization and uniqueness has been an open question. In this context, this work considers the nonlinear steady-state version of the gas flow (GF) problem. It first establishes that the solution to the GF problem is unique under arbitrary NGN topologies, compressor types, and sets of specifications. For GF setups where pressure is specified on a single (reference) node and compressors do no appear in cycles, the GF task is posed as an convex minimization. To handle more general setups, a GF solver relying on a mixed-integer quadratically-constrained quadratic program (MI-QCQP) is also devised. This solver can be used for any GF setup at any NGN. It introduces binary variables to capture flow directions; relaxes the pressure drop equations to quadratic inequality constraints; and uses a carefully selected objective to promote the exactness of this relaxation. The relaxation is provably exact in NGNs with non-overlapping cycles and a single fixed-pressure node. The solver handles efficiently the involved bilinear terms through McCormick linearization. Numerical tests validate our claims, demonstrate that the MI-QCQP solver scales well, and that the relaxation is exact even when the sufficient conditions are violated, such as in NGNs with overlapping cycles and multiple fixed-pressure nodes.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.