Paper detail

Nanostructures mechanically stable with desirable characteristic field enhancement factor: a response from scale invariance in electrostatics

This work presents an accurate numerical study of the electrostatics of systems formed by individual nanostructure mounted on support substrate tip, a theoretical prototype for applications in field electron emission or for construction of tips in probe microscopy requiring high resolution. We modeled substrate tip with height $h_1$, radius $r_{1}$ and characteristic field enhancement factor (FEF) $γ_1$, and the top nanostructure with height $h_2$, radius $r_{2}<r_{1}$ and FEF $γ_2$, both hemisphere on post-like structures. Then, nanostructure mounted on support substrate tip has characteristic FEF, $γ_{C}$. Defining the relative difference $η_R \equiv (γ_{C} - γ_{1})/ (γ_{3} - γ_{1})$, where $γ_{3}$ corresponds to reference FEF for a hemisphere on post structure with radius $r_3=r_2$ and height $h_3=h_1 + h_2$, our results suggest, from numerical solution of Laplace's equation using a finite element scheme, a scaling $η_R = f(u\equivλθ^{-1})$, where $λ\equiv h_{2}/h_1$ and $θ\equiv r_1/r_2$. Given a characteristic variable $u_{c}$, we found, for $u \ll u_{c}$, a power law $η_{R} \sim u^κ$ with $κ\approx 0.55$. For $u \gg u_{c}$, $η_{R} \approx 1$ providing conditions where $γ_C \rightarrow γ_3$. As a consequence of scaling invariance, it's possible to derive a simple expression for $γ_C$, being possible to predict conditions to produce related systems with a desirable FEF and that, at the same time, are mechanically stable by presence of substrate tip. Finally, we also discuss the validity of Schottky's conjecture (SC) for these systems showing that, while to obey SC is a indicative of scale invariance, the opposite is not necessarily satisfied. This suggest that a careful analysis must be done before attribute the SC as a origin of giant FEF in experiments.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.