Paper detail

MXenes as High Capacity Electrode Materials for Metal (Li, Na, K, Ca)-ion batteries

Two-dimensional (2D) materials can have an excellent capability to handle high rates of charge in ion batteries since metal ions need not diffuse in a 3D lattice structure. However graphene, which is the most important 2D material, is known to have no Li capacity. Herein, adsorption of Li, as well as Na, K, and Ca on Ti$_3$C$_2$, one representative MXene, is predicted by first-principles density functional calculations. In our study, we observed that these alkali ions exhibit different adsorption energy depending on the coverage. The adsorption energies of Na, K and Ca decrease as coverage increases, while Li shows little sensitivity to variance in coverage. This observed relationship between adsorption energies and coverage of alkali ions on Ti$_3$C$_2$ can be explained by their effective ionic radii. A larger effective ionic radius increases interaction between alkali atoms, thus lower capacity and coverage are obtained. Our calculated capacity values for Li, Na, K and Ca on Ti$_3$C$_2$ are 639.5, 319.8, 191.8 and 159.9 mAh g$^{-1}$, respectively. Compared to materials currently used in Li ion battery anodes, MXene shows great promise in increasing overall battery performance.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.