Paper detail

Multiwavelength Study of High-Redshift Blazars

High-redshift blazars are among the most powerful objects in the Universe. The spectral and temporal properties of thirty-three distant blazars ($z>2.5$) detected in the high energy $γ$-ray band are investigated by analyzing the {\it Fermi}-LAT and {\it Swift} UVOT/ XRT data. The considered sources have soft time averaged $γ$-ray spectra ($Γ_{\rm γ}\geq2.2$) whereas those that have been observed in the X-ray band have hard X-ray spectra ($Γ_{\rm X}=1.01-1.86$). The $γ$-ray flux of high-redshift blazars ranges from $4.84\times10^{-10}$ to $1.50\times10^{-7}\:{\rm photon\:cm^{-2}\:s^{-1}}$ and the luminosity is within $(0.10-5.54)\times10^{48}\:{\rm erg\:s^{-1}}$ which during the $γ$-ray flares increases up to $(0.1-1)\times10^{50}\:{\rm erg\:s^{-1}}$. In the X-ray band, only the emission of PKS 0438-43, B2 0743+25 and TXS 0222+185 is found to vary in different Swift XRT observations whereas in the $γ$-ray band, the emission is variable for fourteen sources: the flux of B3 1343+451 and PKS 0537-286 changes in sub-day scales, that of PKS 0347-211 and PKS 0451-28 in day scales, while the$γ$-ray variability of the others is in week or month scales. The properties of distant blazar jets are derived by modeling the multiwavelength spectral energy distributions within a one-zone leptonic scenario assuming that the X-ray and $γ$-ray emissions are produced from inverse Compton scattering of synchrotron and dusty torus photons. From the fitting, the emission region size is found to be $\leq0.05$ pc and the magnetic field and the Doppler factor are correspondingly within $0.10-1.74$ G and $10.0-27.4$. By modeling the optical-UV excess, we found that the central black hole masses and accretion disk luminosities are within $L_{\rm d}\simeq(1.09-10.94)\times10^{46}\:{\rm erg \: s^{-1}}$ and $(1.69-5.35)\times10^{9}\:M_\odot$, respectively.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.