Paper detail

Multivariable Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization via Bayesian Directed Cyclic Graphical Models with Correlated Errors

Mendelian randomization (MR) is a pivotal tool in genetics, genomics, and epidemiology, leveraging genetic variants as instrumental variables to infer causal relationships between exposures and outcomes. Traditional MR methods, while powerful, often rely on stringent assumptions such as the absence of feedback loops, which are frequently violated in complex biological networks. In addition, many popular MR approaches focus on only two variables (i.e., one exposure and one outcome), whereas our motivating applications of gene regulatory networks have many variables. In this article, we introduce a novel Bayesian framework for multivariable MR that concurrently addresses unmeasured confounding and feedback loops. Central to our approach is a sparse conditional cyclic graphical model with a sparse error variance-covariance matrix. Two structural priors are employed to enable the modeling and inference of causal relationships as well as latent confounding structures. Our method is designed to operate effectively with summary-level data, facilitating its application in contexts where individual-level data are inaccessible, e.g., due to privacy concerns. It can also account for horizontal pleiotropy, under which we establish the sufficient identifiability conditions. Through extensive simulations and applications to the GTEx and OneK1K data, we demonstrate the superior performance of our approach in recovering biologically plausible causal relationships in the presence of possible feedback loops and unmeasured confounding. Using posterior samples, we further quantify uncertainty in inferred network motifs by computing their posterior probabilities. The R package MR.RGM that implements the proposed method is available on CRAN (https://cran.r-project.org/package=MR.RGM).

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.