Paper detail

Multiple Ray Received Power Modeling for mmWave Indoor and Outdoor Scenarios

Millimeter-wave (mmWave) frequency bands are expected to be used for future 5G networks due to the availability of large unused spectrum. However, the attenuation at mmWave frequencies is high. To resolve this issue, the utilization of high gain antennas and beamforming mechanisms are widely investigated in the literature. In this work, we considered mmWave end-to-end propagation modeled by individual ray sources, and explored the effects of the number of rays in the model and radiation patterns of the deployed antennas on the received power. It is shown that taking the dominant two rays is sufficient to model the channel for outdoor open areas as opposed to the indoor corridor which needs five dominant rays to have a good fit for the measurement and simulation results. It is observed that the radiation pattern of the antenna affects the slope of the path loss. Multi-path components increase the received power, thus, for indoor corridor scenarios, path loss according to the link distance is smaller for lower gain antennas due to increased reception of reflected components. For an outdoor open area, the slope of the path loss is found to be very close to that of the free space.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.