Paper detail

Multiple Inputs Neural Networks for Medicare fraud Detection

Medicare fraud results in considerable losses for governments and insurance companies and results in higher premiums from clients. Medicare fraud costs around 13 billion euros in Europe and between 21 billion and 71 billion US dollars per year in the United States. This study aims to use artificial neural network based classifiers to predict medicare fraud. The main difficulty using machine learning techniques in fraud detection or more generally anomaly detection is that the data sets are highly imbalanced. To detect medicare frauds, we propose a multiple inputs deep neural network based classifier with a Long-short Term Memory (LSTM) autoencoder component. This architecture makes it possible to take into account many sources of data without mixing them and makes the classification task easier for the final model. The latent features extracted from the LSTM autoencoder have a strong discriminating power and separate the providers into homogeneous clusters. We use the data sets from the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) of the US federal government. The CMS provides publicly available data that brings together all of the cost price requests sent by American hospitals to medicare companies. Our results show that although baseline artificial neural network give good performances, they are outperformed by our multiple inputs neural networks. We have shown that using a LSTM autoencoder to embed the provider behavior gives better results and makes the classifiers more robust to class imbalance.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.