Paper detail

Multipath Private Communication: An Information Theoretic Approach

Sending private messages over communication environments under surveillance is an important challenge in communication security and has attracted attentions of cryptographers through time. We believe that resources other than cryptographic keys can be used for communication privacy. We consider private message transmission (PMT) in an abstract multipath communication model between two communicants, Alice and Bob, in the presence of an eavesdropper, Eve. Alice and Bob have pre-shared keys and Eve is computationally unbounded. There are a total of $n$ paths and the three parties can have simultaneous access to at most $t_a$, $t_b$, and $t_e$ paths. The parties can switch their paths after every $λ$ bits of communication. We study perfect (P)-PMT versus asymptotically-perfect (AP)-PMT protocols. The former has zero tolerance of transmission error and leakage, whereas the latter allows for positive error and leakage that tend to zero as the message length increases. We derive the necessary and sufficient conditions under which P-PMT and AP-PMT are possible. We also introduce explicit P-PMT and AP-PMT constructions. Our results show AP-PMT protocols attain much higher information rates than P-PMT ones. Interestingly, AP-PMT is possible even in poorest condition where $t_a=t_b=1$ and $t_e=n-1$. It remains however an open question whether the derived rates can be improved by more sophisticated AP-PMT protocols. We study applications of our results to private communication over the real-life scenarios of multiple-frequency links and multiple-route networks. We show practical examples of such scenarios that can be abstracted by the multipath setting: Our results prove the possibility of keyless information-theoretic private message transmission at rates $17\%$ and $20\%$ for the two example scenarios, respectively. We discuss open problems and future work at the end.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.