Paper detail

Multimodal fusion of imaging and genomics for lung cancer recurrence prediction

Lung cancer has a high rate of recurrence in early-stage patients. Predicting the post-surgical recurrence in lung cancer patients has traditionally been approached using single modality information of genomics or radiology images. We investigate the potential of multimodal fusion for this task. By combining computed tomography (CT) images and genomics, we demonstrate improved prediction of recurrence using linear Cox proportional hazards models with elastic net regularization. We work on a recent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) radiogenomics dataset of 130 patients and observe an increase in concordance-index values of up to 10%. Employing non-linear methods from the neural network literature, such as multi-layer perceptrons and visual-question answering fusion modules, did not improve performance consistently. This indicates the need for larger multimodal datasets and fusion techniques better adapted to this biological setting.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.