Paper detail

Multimessenger constraints for ultra-dense matter

Recent rapid progress in neutron-star (NS) observations offers great potential to constrain the properties of strongly interacting matter under the most extreme conditions. In order to fully exploit the current observational inputs and to study the impact of future observations of NS masses, radii, and tidal deformabilities, we analyze a large ensemble of randomly generated viable NS-matter equations of state (EoSs) and the corresponding rotating stellar structures. We discuss the compatibility and impact of various hypotheses and measurements on the EoS, including those involving the merger product of the gravitational-wave (GW) event GW170817, the binary merger components in GW190814, and radius measurements of the pulsar PSR J0740+6620. We obtain an upper limit for the dimensionless spin of a rigidly rotating NS, $|χ| < 0.81$, an upper limit for the compactness of a NS, $GM/(Rc^2) < 0.33$, and find that the conservative hypothesis that the remnant in GW170817 ultimately collapsed to a black hole strongly constrains the EoS and the maximal mass of NSs, implying $M_\text{TOV} < 2.53 M_\odot$ (or $M_\text{TOV} < 2.19 M_\odot$ if we assume that a hypermassive NS was created). Additionally, we derive a novel lower limit for the tidal deformability as a function of NS mass and provide fitting formulae that can be used to set priors for parameter estimation and to discern whether neutron stars or other compact objects are involved in future low-mass GW events. Finally, we find that the recent NICER results for the radius of the massive NS PSR J0740+6620 place strong constraints for the behavior of the EoS, and that the indicated radius values $R(2M_\odot) \gtrsim 11$ km are compatible with moderate speeds of sound in NS matter and thus with the existence of quark matter cores in massive NSs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.