Abstract
A preference profile with alternatives and voters is -Manhattan (resp. -Euclidean) if both the alternatives and the voters can be placed into the -dimensional space such that between each pair of alternatives, every voter prefers the one which has a shorter Manhattan (resp. Euclidean) distance to the voter. Following Bogomolnaia and Laslier [Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2007] and Chen and Grottke [Social Choice and Welfare, 2021] who look at -Euclidean preference profiles, we study which preference profiles are -Manhattan depending on the values and . First, we show that each preference profile with alternatives and voters is -Manhattan whenever min(, -). Second, for , we show that the smallest non -Manhattan preference profile has either three voters and six alternatives, or four voters and five alternatives, or five voters and four alternatives. This is more complex than the case with -Euclidean preferences (see [Bogomolnaia and Laslier, 2007] and [Bulteau and Chen, 2020].
Connections
Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.
Building this map preview
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Reviews 0
Write a review
No reviews yet.
Discussion 0
Add a comment
No comments yet.