BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Jiehua Chen

Jiehua Chen appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computer Science and Game TheoryMultiagent Systemsmath.COData Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete MathematicsArtificial IntelligenceComputational ComplexityComputational Geometryecon.THSocial and Information Networks

Catalog footprint

What is connected

16works
10topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

16 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

2-Dimensional Euclidean Preferences

A preference profile with m alternatives and n voters is 2-dimensional Euclidean if both the alternatives and the voters can be placed into a 2-dimensional space such that for each pair of alternatives, every voter prefers the one which has a shorter Euclidean distance to the voter. We study how 2-dimensional Euclidean preference profiles depend on the values m and n. We find that any profile with at most two voters or at most three alternatives is 2-dimensional Euclidean while for three voters, we can show this property for up to seven alternatives. The results are tight in terms of Bogomolnaia and Laslier [2, Proposition 15(1)].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Multi-Dimensional Stable Roommates in 2-Dimensional Euclidean Space

We investigate the Euclidean $d$-Dimensional Stable Roommates problem, which asks whether a given set~$V$ of $d \cdot n$ points from the 2-dimensional Euclidean space can be partitioned into $n$ disjoint (unordered) subsets $Π=\{V_1,\ldots,V_{n}\}$ with $|V_i|=d$ for each $V_i\in Π$ such that $Π$ is stable. Here, stability means that no point subset $W\subseteq V$ is blocking $Π$ and $W$ is said to be blocking $Π$ if $|W|= d$ such that $\sum_{w'\in W}δ(w,w') < \sum_{v\in Π(w)}δ(w,v)$ holds for each point $w\in W$, where $Π(w)$ denotes the subset $V_i\in Π$ which contains $w$ and $δ(a,b)$ denotes the Euclidean distance between points $a$ and $b$. Complementing the existing known polynomial-time result for $d=2$, we show that such polynomial-time algorithms cannot exist for any fixed number $d \ge 3$ unless P=NP. Our result for $d=3$ answers a decade-long open question in the theory of Stable Matching and Hedonic Games [17, 1, 9, 25, 20].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Multidimensional Manhattan Preferences

A preference profile with $m$ alternatives and $n$ voters is $d$-Manhattan (resp. $d$-Euclidean) if both the alternatives and the voters can be placed into the $d$-dimensional space such that between each pair of alternatives, every voter prefers the one which has a shorter Manhattan (resp. Euclidean) distance to the voter. Following Bogomolnaia and Laslier [Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2007] and Chen and Grottke [Social Choice and Welfare, 2021] who look at $d$-Euclidean preference profiles, we study which preference profiles are $d$-Manhattan depending on the values $m$ and $n$. First, we show that each preference profile with $m$ alternatives and $n$ voters is $d$-Manhattan whenever $d$ $\geq$ min($n$, $m$-$1$). Second, for $d = 2$, we show that the smallest non $d$-Manhattan preference profile has either three voters and six alternatives, or four voters and five alternatives, or five voters and four alternatives. This is more complex than the case with $d$-Euclidean preferences (see [Bogomolnaia and Laslier, 2007] and [Bulteau and Chen, 2020].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Parameterized Intractability for Multi-Winner Election under the Chamberlin-Courant Rule and the Monroe Rule

Answering an open question by Betzler et al. [Betzler et al., JAIR'13], we resolve the parameterized complexity of the multi-winner determination problem under two famous representation voting rules: the Chamberlin-Courant (in short CC) rule [Chamberlin and Courant, APSR'83] and the Monroe rule [Monroe, APSR'95]. We show that under both rules, the problem is W[1]-hard with respect to the sum $β$ of misrepresentations, thereby precluding the existence of any $f(β) \cdot |I|^{O(1)}$ -time algorithm, where $|I|$ denotes the size of the input instance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Reaching Stable Marriage via Divorces is Hard

We study the Reaching Stable Marriage via Divorces (DivorceSM) problem of deciding, given a Stable Marriage instance and an initial matching $M$ , whether there exists a stable matching which is reachable from $M$ by divorce operations as introduced by Knuth [12]. Towards answering an open question of Manlove [13] and Cechlárová et al. [3], we show that for incomplete preferences without ties, DivorceSM is NP-hard. Our hardness reduction also implies that the problem remains parameterized intractable for the number $κ$ of allowed divorce operations. It remains NP-hard even if the maximum length $d$ of the preferences is a constant. For the combined parameter ($κ$, $d$), the problem is fixed-parameter tractable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Efficient fully dynamic elimination forests with applications to detecting long paths and cycles

We present a data structure that in a dynamic graph of treedepth at most $d$, which is modified over time by edge insertions and deletions, maintains an optimum-height elimination forest. The data structure achieves worst-case update time $2^{{\cal O}(d^2)}$, which matches the best known parameter dependency in the running time of a static fpt algorithm for computing the treedepth of a graph. This improves a result of Dvořák et al. [ESA 2014], who for the same problem achieved update time $f(d)$ for some non-elementary (i.e. tower-exponential) function $f$. As a by-product, we improve known upper bounds on the sizes of minimal obstructions for having treedepth $d$ from doubly-exponential in $d$ to $d^{{\cal O}(d)}$. As applications, we design new fully dynamic parameterized data structures for detecting long paths and cycles in general graphs. More precisely, for a fixed parameter $k$ and a dynamic graph $G$, modified over time by edge insertions and deletions, our data structures maintain answers to the following queries: - Does $G$ contain a simple path on $k$ vertices? - Does $G$ contain a simple cycle on at least $k$ vertices? In the first case, the data structure achieves amortized update time $2^{{\cal O}(k^2)}$. In the second case, the amortized update time is $2^{{\cal O}(k^4)} + {\cal O}(k \log n)$. In both cases we assume access to a dictionary on the edges of $G$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Stable Matchings with Diversity Constraints: Affirmative Action is beyond NP

We investigate the following many-to-one stable matching problem with diversity constraints (SMTI-Diverse): Given a set of students and a set of colleges which have preferences over each other, where the students have overlapping types, and the colleges each have a total capacity as well as quotas for individual types (the diversity constraints), is there a matching satisfying all diversity constraints such that no unmatched student-college pair has an incentive to deviate? SMTI-Diverse is known to be NP-hard. However, as opposed to the NP-membership claims in the literature [Aziz et al., AAMAS 2019; Huang, SODA 2010], we prove that it is beyond NP: it is complete for the complexity class $Σ^{\text{P}}_2$. In addition, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the problem's complexity from the viewpoint of natural restrictions to inputs and obtain new algorithms for the problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Stable Roommates with Narcissistic, Single-Peaked, and Single-Crossing Preferences

The classical Stable Roommates problem is to decide whether there exists a matching of an even number of agents such that no two agents which are not matched to each other would prefer to be with each other rather than with their respectively assigned partners. We investigate Stable Roommates with complete (i.e., every agent can be matched with any other agent) or incomplete preferences, with ties (i.e., two agents are considered of equal value to some agent) or without ties. It is known that in general allowing ties makes the problem NP-complete. We provide algorithms for Stable Roommates that are, compared to those in the literature, more efficient when the input preferences are complete and have some structural property, such as being narcissistic, single-peaked, and single-crossing. However, when the preferences are incomplete and have ties, we show that being single-peaked and single-crossing does not reduce the computational complexity--Stable Roommates remains NP-complete.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Prices Matter for the Parameterized Complexity of Shift Bribery

In the Shift Bribery problem, we are given an election (based on preference orders), a preferred candidate $p$, and a budget. The goal is to ensure that $p$ wins by shifting $p$ higher in some voters' preference orders. However, each such shift request comes at a price (depending on the voter and on the extent of the shift) and we must not exceed the given budget. We study the parameterized computational complexity of Shift Bribery with respect to a number of parameters (pertaining to the nature of the solution sought and the size of the election) and several classes of price functions. When we parameterize Shift Bribery by the number of affected voters, then for each of our voting rules (Borda, Maximin, Copeland) the problem is W[2]-hard. If, instead, we parameterize by the number of positions by which $p$ is shifted in total,then the problem is fixed-parameter tractable for Borda and Maximin,and is W[1]-hard for Copeland. If we parameterize by the budget, then the results depend on the price function class. We also show that Shift Bribery tends to be tractable when parameterized by the number of voters, but that the results for the number of candidates are more enigmatic.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Teams in Online Scheduling Polls: Game-Theoretic Aspects

Consider an important meeting to be held in a team-based organization. Taking availability constraints into account, an online scheduling poll is being used in order to decide upon the exact time of the meeting. Decisions are to be taken during the meeting, therefore each team would like to maximize its relative attendance in the meeting (i.e., the proportional number of its participating team members). We introduce a corresponding game, where each team can declare (in the scheduling poll) a lower total availability, in order to improve its relative attendance---the pay-off. We are especially interested in situations where teams can form coalitions. We provide an efficient algorithm that, given a coalition, finds an optimal way for each team in a coalition to improve its pay-off. In contrast, we show that deciding whether such a coalition exists is NP-hard. We also study the existence of Nash equilibria: Finding Nash equilibria for various small sizes of teams and coalitions can be done in polynomial time while it is coNP-hard if the coalition size is unbounded.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Are there any nicely structured preference~profiles~nearby?

We investigate the problem of deciding whether a given preference profile is close to having a certain nice structure, as for instance single-peaked, single-caved, single-crossing, value-restricted, best-restricted, worst-restricted, medium-restricted, or group-separable profiles. We measure this distance by the number of voters or alternatives that have to be deleted to make the profile a nicely structured one. Our results classify the problem variants with respect to their computational complexity, and draw a clear line between computationally tractable (polynomial-time solvable) and computationally intractable (NP-hard) questions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Network-Based Vertex Dissolution

We introduce a graph-theoretic vertex dissolution model that applies to a number of redistribution scenarios such as gerrymandering in political districting or work balancing in an online situation. The central aspect of our model is the deletion of certain vertices and the redistribution of their load to neighboring vertices in a completely balanced way. We investigate how the underlying graph structure, the knowledge of which vertices should be deleted, and the relation between old and new vertex loads influence the computational complexity of the underlying graph problems. Our results establish a clear borderline between tractable and intractable cases.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Parliamentary Voting Procedures: Agenda Control, Manipulation, and Uncertainty

We study computational problems for two popular parliamentary voting procedures: the amendment procedure and the successive procedure. While finding successful manipulations or agenda controls is tractable for both procedures, our real-world experimental results indicate that most elections cannot be manipulated by a few voters and agenda control is typically impossible. If the voter preferences are incomplete, then finding which alternatives can possibly win is NP-hard for both procedures. Whilst deciding if an alternative necessarily wins is coNP-hard for the amendment procedure, it is polynomial-time solvable for the successive one.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Combinatorial Voter Control in Elections

Voter control problems model situations such as an external agent trying to affect the result of an election by adding voters, for example by convincing some voters to vote who would otherwise not attend the election. Traditionally, voters are added one at a time, with the goal of making a distinguished alternative win by adding a minimum number of voters. In this paper, we initiate the study of combinatorial variants of control by adding voters: In our setting, when we choose to add a voter~$v$, we also have to add a whole bundle $κ(v)$ of voters associated with $v$. We study the computational complexity of this problem for two of the most basic voting rules, namely the Plurality rule and the Condorcet rule.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Parameterized Algorithmics for Computational Social Choice: Nine Research Challenges

Computational Social Choice is an interdisciplinary research area involving Economics, Political Science, and Social Science on the one side, and Mathematics and Computer Science (including Artificial Intelligence and Multiagent Systems) on the other side. Typical computational problems studied in this field include the vulnerability of voting procedures against attacks, or preference aggregation in multi-agent systems. Parameterized Algorithmics is a subfield of Theoretical Computer Science seeking to exploit meaningful problem-specific parameters in order to identify tractable special cases of in general computationally hard problems. In this paper, we propose nine of our favorite research challenges concerning the parameterized complexity of problems appearing in this context.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access