BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jiehua Chen

Jiehua Chen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computer Science and Game TheoryMultiagent Systemsmath.COArtificial IntelligenceComputational ComplexityComputational GeometryData Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete Mathematicsecon.TH

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
9topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

2-Dimensional Euclidean Preferences

A preference profile with m alternatives and n voters is 2-dimensional Euclidean if both the alternatives and the voters can be placed into a 2-dimensional space such that for each pair of alternatives, every voter prefers the one which has a shorter Euclidean distance to the voter. We study how 2-dimensional Euclidean preference profiles depend on the values m and n. We find that any profile with at most two voters or at most three alternatives is 2-dimensional Euclidean while for three voters, we can show this property for up to seven alternatives. The results are tight in terms of Bogomolnaia and Laslier [2, Proposition 15(1)].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Multi-Dimensional Stable Roommates in 2-Dimensional Euclidean Space

We investigate the Euclidean $d$-Dimensional Stable Roommates problem, which asks whether a given set~$V$ of $d \cdot n$ points from the 2-dimensional Euclidean space can be partitioned into $n$ disjoint (unordered) subsets $Π=\{V_1,\ldots,V_{n}\}$ with $|V_i|=d$ for each $V_i\in Π$ such that $Π$ is stable. Here, stability means that no point subset $W\subseteq V$ is blocking $Π$ and $W$ is said to be blocking $Π$ if $|W|= d$ such that $\sum_{w&#39;\in W}δ(w,w&#39;) < \sum_{v\in Π(w)}δ(w,v)$ holds for each point $w\in W$, where $Π(w)$ denotes the subset $V_i\in Π$ which contains $w$ and $δ(a,b)$ denotes the Euclidean distance between points $a$ and $b$. Complementing the existing known polynomial-time result for $d=2$, we show that such polynomial-time algorithms cannot exist for any fixed number $d \ge 3$ unless P=NP. Our result for $d=3$ answers a decade-long open question in the theory of Stable Matching and Hedonic Games [17, 1, 9, 25, 20].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Multidimensional Manhattan Preferences

A preference profile with $m$ alternatives and $n$ voters is $d$-Manhattan (resp. $d$-Euclidean) if both the alternatives and the voters can be placed into the $d$-dimensional space such that between each pair of alternatives, every voter prefers the one which has a shorter Manhattan (resp. Euclidean) distance to the voter. Following Bogomolnaia and Laslier [Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2007] and Chen and Grottke [Social Choice and Welfare, 2021] who look at $d$-Euclidean preference profiles, we study which preference profiles are $d$-Manhattan depending on the values $m$ and $n$. First, we show that each preference profile with $m$ alternatives and $n$ voters is $d$-Manhattan whenever $d$ $\geq$ min($n$, $m$-$1$). Second, for $d = 2$, we show that the smallest non $d$-Manhattan preference profile has either three voters and six alternatives, or four voters and five alternatives, or five voters and four alternatives. This is more complex than the case with $d$-Euclidean preferences (see [Bogomolnaia and Laslier, 2007] and [Bulteau and Chen, 2020].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Parameterized Intractability for Multi-Winner Election under the Chamberlin-Courant Rule and the Monroe Rule

Answering an open question by Betzler et al. [Betzler et al., JAIR&#39;13], we resolve the parameterized complexity of the multi-winner determination problem under two famous representation voting rules: the Chamberlin-Courant (in short CC) rule [Chamberlin and Courant, APSR&#39;83] and the Monroe rule [Monroe, APSR&#39;95]. We show that under both rules, the problem is W[1]-hard with respect to the sum $β$ of misrepresentations, thereby precluding the existence of any $f(β) \cdot |I|^{O(1)}$ -time algorithm, where $|I|$ denotes the size of the input instance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Reaching Stable Marriage via Divorces is Hard

We study the Reaching Stable Marriage via Divorces (DivorceSM) problem of deciding, given a Stable Marriage instance and an initial matching $M$ , whether there exists a stable matching which is reachable from $M$ by divorce operations as introduced by Knuth [12]. Towards answering an open question of Manlove [13] and Cechlárová et al. [3], we show that for incomplete preferences without ties, DivorceSM is NP-hard. Our hardness reduction also implies that the problem remains parameterized intractable for the number $κ$ of allowed divorce operations. It remains NP-hard even if the maximum length $d$ of the preferences is a constant. For the combined parameter ($κ$, $d$), the problem is fixed-parameter tractable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Efficient fully dynamic elimination forests with applications to detecting long paths and cycles

We present a data structure that in a dynamic graph of treedepth at most $d$, which is modified over time by edge insertions and deletions, maintains an optimum-height elimination forest. The data structure achieves worst-case update time $2^{{\cal O}(d^2)}$, which matches the best known parameter dependency in the running time of a static fpt algorithm for computing the treedepth of a graph. This improves a result of Dvořák et al. [ESA 2014], who for the same problem achieved update time $f(d)$ for some non-elementary (i.e. tower-exponential) function $f$. As a by-product, we improve known upper bounds on the sizes of minimal obstructions for having treedepth $d$ from doubly-exponential in $d$ to $d^{{\cal O}(d)}$. As applications, we design new fully dynamic parameterized data structures for detecting long paths and cycles in general graphs. More precisely, for a fixed parameter $k$ and a dynamic graph $G$, modified over time by edge insertions and deletions, our data structures maintain answers to the following queries: - Does $G$ contain a simple path on $k$ vertices? - Does $G$ contain a simple cycle on at least $k$ vertices? In the first case, the data structure achieves amortized update time $2^{{\cal O}(k^2)}$. In the second case, the amortized update time is $2^{{\cal O}(k^4)} + {\cal O}(k \log n)$. In both cases we assume access to a dictionary on the edges of $G$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Stable Matchings with Diversity Constraints: Affirmative Action is beyond NP

We investigate the following many-to-one stable matching problem with diversity constraints (SMTI-Diverse): Given a set of students and a set of colleges which have preferences over each other, where the students have overlapping types, and the colleges each have a total capacity as well as quotas for individual types (the diversity constraints), is there a matching satisfying all diversity constraints such that no unmatched student-college pair has an incentive to deviate? SMTI-Diverse is known to be NP-hard. However, as opposed to the NP-membership claims in the literature [Aziz et al., AAMAS 2019; Huang, SODA 2010], we prove that it is beyond NP: it is complete for the complexity class $Σ^{\text{P}}_2$. In addition, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the problem&#39;s complexity from the viewpoint of natural restrictions to inputs and obtain new algorithms for the problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Stable Roommates with Narcissistic, Single-Peaked, and Single-Crossing Preferences

The classical Stable Roommates problem is to decide whether there exists a matching of an even number of agents such that no two agents which are not matched to each other would prefer to be with each other rather than with their respectively assigned partners. We investigate Stable Roommates with complete (i.e., every agent can be matched with any other agent) or incomplete preferences, with ties (i.e., two agents are considered of equal value to some agent) or without ties. It is known that in general allowing ties makes the problem NP-complete. We provide algorithms for Stable Roommates that are, compared to those in the literature, more efficient when the input preferences are complete and have some structural property, such as being narcissistic, single-peaked, and single-crossing. However, when the preferences are incomplete and have ties, we show that being single-peaked and single-crossing does not reduce the computational complexity--Stable Roommates remains NP-complete.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access