Paper detail

Multi-wavelength emission from 3C 66A: clues on its redshift and gamma-ray emission location

The quasi-simultaneous multi-wavelength emission of TeV blazar 3C 66A is studied by using a one-zone multi-component leptonic jet model. It is found that the quasi-simultaneous spectral energy distribution (SED) of 3C 66A can be well reproduced, especially its {\it Fermi}-LAT first 3 months average spectrum can be well reproduced by the synchrotron-self Compton (SSC) component plus external Compton (EC) component of the broad line region (BLR). Clues on its redshift and gamma-ray emission location are obtained. The results indicate the following. (i) On the redshift; The theoretical intrinsic TeV spectra can be predicted by extrapolating the reproduced GeV spectra. Through comparing this extrapolated TeV spectra with the extragalactic background light (EBL) corrected observed TeV spectra, it is suggested that the redshift of 3C 66A could be between 0.1 and 0.3, the most likely value is $\sim$ 0.2. (ii) On the gamma-ray emission location; To well reproduce the GeV emission of 3C 66A under different assumptions on BLR, the gamma-ray emission region is always required to be beyond the inner zone of BLR. The BLR absorption effect on gamma-ray emission confirms this point.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.