Paper detail

Multi-team Formation using Community Based Approach in Real-World Networks

In an organization, tasks called projects that require several skills, are generally assigned to teams rather than individuals. The problem of choosing a right team for a given task with minimal communication cost is known as team formation problem and many algorithms have been proposed in the literature. We propose an algorithm that exploits the community structure of the social network and forms a team by choosing a leader along with its neighbours from within a community. This algorithm is different from the skill-centric algorithms in the literature which start by searching for each skill, the suitable experts and do not explicitly consider the structure of the underlying social network. The strategy of community-based team formation called TFC leads to a scalable approach that obtains teams within reasonable time over very large networks. Further, for one task our algorithms TFC-R and TFC-N generate multiple teams from the communities which is show-cased as a case-study in the paper. The experimentation is carried out on the well-known DBLP data set where the task is considered as writing a research paper and the words of the title are considered as skills. Team formation problem is translated to finding possible authors for the given paper, who have the required skills and having least communication cost. In the process, we build a much larger bench-mark data set from DBLP for team formation for experimentation. Even though the benchmark algorithm Rarestfirst takes least time, our algorithms TFC-N and TFC-R give much better communication cost. They also outperform the standard algorithms like MinLD and MinSD with respect to the time taken in finding a team. The time taken by our algorithms on communities are several orders faster than the time taken on the larger network without compromising too much on the communication cost.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.