Paper detail

Multi-Object Grasping -- Types and Taxonomy

This paper proposes 12 multi-object grasps (MOGs) types from a human and robot grasping data set. The grasp types are then analyzed and organized into a MOG taxonomy. This paper first presents three MOG data collection setups: a human finger tracking setup for multi-object grasping demonstrations, a real system with Barretthand, UR5e arm, and a MOG algorithm, a simulation system with the same settings as the real system. Then the paper describes a novel stochastic grasping routine designed based on a biased random walk to explore the robotic hand's configuration space for feasible MOGs. Based on observations in both the human demonstrations and robotic MOG solutions, this paper proposes 12 MOG types in two groups: shape-based types and function-based types. The new MOG types are compared using six characteristics and then compiled into a taxonomy. This paper then introduces the observed MOG type combinations and shows examples of 16 different combinations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.