Paper detail

Multi-minijet Contribution to Hadronic Spectra and Correlations in Pb-Pb Collisions at 2.76 TeV and beyond

In heavy-ion collisions at very high energy the density of produced jets can be so high that the possibility of hadrons produced by recombination of shower partons in overlapping minijets may become important. We study such multi-minijet contribution to the hadron spectra and to dihadron correlation in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV at LHC. We adjust the parameter controlling the momentum degradation of semihard partons by fitting the charged-particle distribution up to $p_T\sim 16$ GeV/c. The relative magnitudes of different identified hadrons and of various partonic components are fixed by the recombination formalism. We find that the coalescence of shower patons from adjacent miniijets can be as much as from single jets for meson production, and even more so for proton, but never dominant over other components. In 3-shower-parton recombination the ratio of 2-jet to 1-jet contributions increases with collision energy; its maximum can exceed 2 at 5.5 TeV. Two-hadron correlation exhibits a broad peak on transverse rapidities, confirming that minijets play a central role at low $p_T$.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.