Paper detail

Multi-layered characterization of hot stellar systems with confidence

Understanding the physical and evolutionary properties of Hot Stellar Systems (HSS) is a major challenge in astronomy. We studied the dataset on 13456 HSS of Misgeld and Hilker (2011) that includes 12763 candidate globular clusters using stellar mass ($M_s$), effective radius ($R_e$) and mass-to-luminosity ratio ($M_s/L_ν$), and found multi-layered homogeneous grouping among these stellar systems. Our methods elicited eight homogeneous ellipsoidal groups at the finest sub-group level. Some of these groups have high overlap and were merged through a multi-phased syncytial algorithm motivated from Almodóvar-Rivera and Maitra (2020). Five groups were merged in the first phase, resulting in three complex-structured groups. Our algorithm determined further complex structure and permitted another merging phase, revealing two complex-structured groups at the highest level. A nonparametric bootstrap procedure was also used to estimate the confidence of each of our group assignments. These assignments generally had high confidence in classification, indicating great degree of certainty of the HSS assignments into our complex-structured groups. The physical and kinematic properties of the two groups were assessed in terms of $M_s$, $R_e$, surface density and $M_s/L_ν$. The first group consisted of older, smaller and less bright HSS while the second group consisted of brighter and younger HSS. Our analysis provides novel insight into the physical and evolutionary properties of HSS and also helps understand physical and evolutionary properties of candidate globular clusters. Further, the candidate globular clusters (GCs) are seen to have very high chance of really being GCs rather than dwarfs or dwarf ellipticals that are also indicated to be quite distinct from each other.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.