Paper detail

Multi-GPU Acceleration of PALABOS Fluid Solver using C++ Standard Parallelism

This article presents the principles, software architecture, and performance analysis of the GPU port of the lattice Boltzmann software library Palabos (J. Latt et al., "Palabos: Parallel lattice Boltzmann solver", Comput. Math. Appl. 81, 334-350, (2021)). A hybrid CPU-GPU execution model is adopted, in which numerical components are selectively assigned to either the CPU or the GPU, depending on considerations of performance or convenience. This design enables a progressive porting strategy, allowing most features of the original CPU-based codebase to be gradually and seamlessly adapted to GPU execution. The new architecture builds upon two complementary paradigms: a classical object-oriented structure for CPU execution, and a data-oriented counterpart for GPUs, which reproduces the modularity of the original code while eliminating object-oriented overhead detrimental to GPU performance. Central to this approach is the use of modern C++, including standard parallel algorithms and template metaprogramming techniques, which permit the generation of hardware-agnostic computational kernels. This facilitates the development of user-defined, GPU-accelerated components such as collision operators or boundary conditions, while preserving compatibility with the existing codebase and avoiding the need for external libraries or non-standard language extensions. The correctness and performance of the GPU-enabled Palabos are demonstrated through a series of three-dimensional multiphysics benchmarks, including the laminar-turbulent transition in a Taylor-Green vortex, lid-driven cavity flow, and pore-scale flow in Berea sandstone. Despite the high-level abstraction of the implementation, the single-GPU performance is similar to CUDA-native solvers, and multi-GPU tests exhibit good weak and strong scaling across all test cases.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.