Paper detail

Multi-fidelity hydrodynamic analysis of an autonomous surface vehicle at surveying speed in deep water subject to variable payload

Autonomous surface vehicles (ASV) allow the investigation of coastal areas, ports and harbors as well as harsh and dangerous environments such as the arctic regions. Despite receiving increasing attention, the hydrodynamic analysis of ASV performance subject to variable operational parameters is little investigated. In this context, this paper presents a multi-fidelity (MF) hydrodynamic analysis of an ASV, namely the Shallow Water Autonomous Multipurpose Platform (SWAMP), at surveying speed in calm water and subject to variable payload and location of the center of mass, accounting for the variety of equipment that the vehicle can carry. The analysis is conducted in deep water, which is the condition mostly encountered by the ASV during surveys of coastal and harbors areas. Quantities of interest are the resistance, the vehicle attitude, and the wave generated in the region between the catamaran hulls. These are assessed using a Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes Equation (RANSE) code and a linear potential flow (PF) solver. The objective is to accurately assess the quantities of interest, along with identifying the limitation of PF analysis in the current context. Finally, a multi-fidelity Gaussian Process (MF-GP) model is obtained combining RANSE and PF solutions. The latter also include variable grid refinement and coupling between hydrodynamic loads and rigid body equations of motion. The surrogate model is iteratively refined using an active learning approach. Numerical results show that the MF-GP is effective in producing response surfaces of the SWAMP performance with a limited computational cost. It is highlighted how the SWAMP performance is significantly affected not only by the payload, but also by the location of the center of mass. The latter can be therefore properly calibrated to minimize the resistance and allow for longer-range operations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.