Paper detail

Multi-dimensional intra-tile parallelization for memory-starved stencil computations

Optimizing the performance of stencil algorithms has been the subject of intense research over the last two decades. Since many stencil schemes have low arithmetic intensity, most optimizations focus on increasing the temporal data access locality, thus reducing the data traffic through the main memory interface with the ultimate goal of decoupling from this bottleneck. There are, however, only few approaches that explicitly leverage the shared cache feature of modern multicore chips. If every thread works on its private, separate cache block, the available cache space can become too small, and sufficient temporal locality may not be achieved. We propose a flexible multi-dimensional intra-tile parallelization method for stencil algorithms on multicore CPUs with a shared outer-level cache. This method leads to a significant reduction in the required cache space without adverse effects from hardware prefetching or TLB shortage. Our \emph{Girih} framework includes an auto-tuner to select optimal parameter configurations on the target hardware. We conduct performance experiments on two contemporary Intel processors and compare with the state-of-the-art stencil frameworks PLUTO and Pochoir, using four corner-case stencil schemes and a wide range of problem sizes. \emph{Girih} shows substantial performance advantages and best arithmetic intensity at almost all problem sizes, especially on low-intensity stencils with variable coefficients. We study in detail the performance behavior at varying grid size using phenomenological performance modeling. Our analysis of energy consumption reveals that our method can save energy by reduced DRAM bandwidth usage even at marginal performance gain. It is thus well suited for future architectures that will be strongly challenged by the cost of data movement, be it in terms of performance or energy consumption.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.