Paper detail

Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Partitioning Schemes for Real-Time Systems

In this paper we study the partitioning approach for multiprocessor real-time scheduling. This approach seems to be the easiest since, once the partitioning of the task set has been done, the problem reduces to well understood uniprocessor issues. Meanwhile, there is no optimal and polynomial solution to partition tasks on processors. In this paper we analyze partitioning algorithms from several points of view such that for a given task set and specific constraints (processor number, task set type, etc.) we should be able to identify the best heuristic and the best schedulability test. We also analyze the influence of the heuristics on the performance of the uniprocessor tests and the impact of a specific task order on the schedulability. A study on performance difference between Fixed Priority schedulers and EDF in the case of partitioning scheduling is also considered.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.