Paper detail

Motif Identification using CNN-based Pairwise Subsequence Alignment Score Prediction

A common problem in bioinformatics is related to identifying gene regulatory regions marked by relatively high frequencies of motifs, or deoxyribonucleic acid sequences that often code for transcription and enhancer proteins. Predicting alignment scores between subsequence k-mers and a given motif enables the identification of candidate regulatory regions in a gene, which correspond to the transcription of these proteins. We propose a one-dimensional (1-D) Convolution Neural Network trained on k-mer formatted sequences interspaced with the given motif pattern to predict pairwise alignment scores between the consensus motif and subsequence k-mers. Our model consists of fifteen layers with three rounds of a one-dimensional convolution layer, a batch normalization layer, a dense layer, and a 1-D maximum pooling layer. We train the model using mean squared error loss on four different data sets each with a different motif pattern randomly inserted in DNA sequences: the first three data sets have zero, one, and two mutations applied on each inserted motif, and the fourth data set represents the inserted motif as a position-specific probability matrix. We use a novel proposed metric in order to evaluate the model's performance, $S_α$, which is based on the Jaccard Index. We use 10-fold cross validation to evaluate out model. Using $S_α$, we measure the accuracy of the model by identifying the 15 highest-scoring 15-mer indices of the predicted scores that agree with that of the actual scores within a selected $α$ region. For the best performing data set, our results indicate on average 99.3% of the top 15 motifs were identified correctly within a one base pair stride ($α= 1$) in the out of sample data. To the best of our knowledge, this is a novel approach that illustrates how data formatted in an intelligent way can be extrapolated using machine learning.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.