Paper detail

Most, And Least, Compact Spanning Trees of a Graph

We introduce the concept of Most, and Least, Compact Spanning Trees - denoted respectively by $T^*(G)$ and $T^\#(G)$ - of a simple, connected, undirected and unweighted graph $G(V, E, W)$. For a spanning tree $T(G) \in \mathcal{T}(G)$ to be considered $T^*(G)$, where $\mathcal{T}(G)$ represents the set of all the spanning trees of the graph $G$, it must have the least average inter-vertex pair (shortest path) distances from amongst the members of the set $\mathcal{T}(G)$. Similarly, for it to be considered $T^\#(G)$, it must have the highest average inter-vertex pair (shortest path) distances. In this work, we present an iteratively greedy rank-and-regress method that produces at least one $T^*(G)$ or $T^\#(G)$ by eliminating one extremal edge per iteration. The rank function for performing the elimination is based on the elements of the matrix of relative forest accessibilities of a graph and the related forest distance. We provide empirical evidence in support of our methodology using some standard graph families: complete graphs, the Erdős-Renyi random graphs and the Barabási-Albert scale-free graphs; and discuss computational complexity of the underlying methods which incur polynomial time costs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.