Paper detail

More Tight Bounds for Active Self-Assembly Using an Insertion Primitive

We prove several limits on the behavior of a model of self-assembling particles introduced by Dabby and Chen (SODA 2013), called insertion systems, where monomers insert themselves into the middle of a growing linear polymer. First, we prove that the expressive power of these systems is equal to context-free grammars, answering a question posed by Dabby and Chen. Second, we give tight bounds on the maximum length and minimum expected time of constructed polymers in systems of three increasingly restricted classes. We prove that systems of $k$ monomer types can deterministically construct polymers of length $n = 2^{Θ(k^{3/2})}$ in $O(\log^{5/3}(n))$ expected time. We also prove that if non-deterministic construction of a finite number of polymers is permitted, then the expected construction time can be reduced to $O(\log^{3/2}(n))$ at the trade-off of decreasing the length to $2^{Θ(k)}$. If the system is allowed to construct an infinite number of polymers, then constructing polymers of unbounded length in $O(\log{n})$ expected time is possible. We follow these positive results with a set of lower bounds proving that these are the best possible polymer lengths and expected construction times.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.