Paper detail

More on the admissible condition on differentiable maps $φ: (X^{\!A\!z},E;\nabla)\rightarrow Y$ in the construction of the non-Abelian Dirac-Born-Infeld action $S_{DBI}(φ,\nabla)$

In D(13.1) (arXiv:1606.08529 [hep-th]), we introduced an admissible condition on differentiable maps $φ: (X^{\!A\!z}, E;\nabla)\rightarrow Y$ from an Azumaya/matrix manifold $X^{\!A\!z}$ (with the fundamental module $E$) with a connection $\nabla$ on $E$ to a manifold $Y$ in order to resolve a pull-push issue in the construction of a non-Abelian-Dirac-Infeld action $S_{DBI}$ for $(φ,\nabla)$ and to render $\nabla$ massless from the aspect of open strings. The admissible condition ibidem consists of two parts: Condition (1) and Condition (2). In this brief note, we examine these two conditions in more detail and bring their geometric implications on $(φ,\nabla)$ and the full action $S_{DBI}(φ,\nabla)+S_{CS/WZ}(φ,\nabla)$ more transparent. In particular, we show that Condition (1) alone already implies masslessness of $\nabla$ from open-string aspect; and that the additional Condition (2) implies a decoupling of the nilpotent fuzzy cloud of $φ(X^{\!A\!z})$ to the dynamics of $(φ, \nabla)$. We conclude with a refined definition of admissible $(φ,\nabla)$ and a remark on the anomaly factor in the integrand of the Chern-Simons/Wess-Zumino term $S_{CS/WZ}(φ,\nabla)$ for D-branes based on the current study.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.