Paper detail

Monte Carlo Simulation of Melting and Lattice Relaxation of the (111) Surface of Silver

It is experimentally observed and theoretically proved that the distance between topmost layers of a metal surface has a contraction. However, well-known potentials such as Lennard-Jones and Morse potentials lead to an expansion of the surface inter-layer distance. Such simple potentials therefore cannot be used to study metal surface relaxation. In this paper, extensive Monte Carlo simulations are used to study the silver (111) surface with both the Gupta potential (GP) and the Embedded Atom Method (EAM) potential. Our results of the lattice relaxation at the (111) surface of silver show indeed a contraction for both potentials at low temperatures in agreement with experiments and early theories. However at higher temperatures, the EAM potential yields a surface melting at $\simeq 700$ K very low with respect to the experimental bulk melting at $\simeq 1235$ K while the GP yields a surface melting at $\simeq 1000$ K closer to the bulk one. In addition, we observe with the EAM potential an anomalous thermal expansion, i. e. the surface contraction becomes a surface dilatation with respect to the bulk, at $\simeq 900$ K. The Gupta potential does not show this behavior.We compare our results with different experimental and numerical results.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.