Paper detail

Monte Carlo Matrix Inversion Policy Evaluation

In 1950, Forsythe and Leibler (1950) introduced a statistical technique for finding the inverse of a matrix by characterizing the elements of the matrix inverse as expected values of a sequence of random walks. Barto and Duff (1994) subsequently showed relations between this technique and standard dynamic programming and temporal differencing methods. The advantage of the Monte Carlo matrix inversion (MCMI) approach is that it scales better with respect to state-space size than alternative techniques. In this paper, we introduce an algorithm for performing reinforcement learning policy evaluation using MCMI. We demonstrate that MCMI improves on runtime over a maximum likelihood model-based policy evaluation approach and on both runtime and accuracy over the temporal differencing (TD) policy evaluation approach. We further improve on MCMI policy evaluation by adding an importance sampling technique to our algorithm to reduce the variance of our estimator. Lastly, we illustrate techniques for scaling up MCMI to large state spaces in order to perform policy improvement.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.