Paper detail

Monte Carlo-based estimation of patient absorbed dose in 99mTc-DMSA, -MAG3, and -DTPA SPECT imaging using the University of Florida (UF) phantoms

SPECT imaging is one of the common modalities used to examine kidney disease. The radiopharmaceuticals such as 99mTc-MAG3, 99mTc-DTPA, and 99mTc-DMSA are commonly employed for pediatric patients. It is generally accepted that children organs are more sensitive to radiation than adults, due to their growth rate. Therefore, evaluating the absorbed dose in children to avoid irrecoverable damage is highly crucial. In this work, absorbed dose by different organs of children within the SPECT imaging for the above-mentioned radiopharmaceuticals were estimated through the use of Monte Carlo simulation for patients at the ages of 4, 8, 11, and 14-years old. The patients absorbed dose was estimated based on the specific radiopharmaceutical uptake patterns and the age-related human body models. To this end, we used the University of Florida (UF) voxel-wise baby phantoms and the Monte Carlo simulation for the pediatric patients at 4, 8, 11, and 14 years of age. The accuracy of the dosimetric outcomes was evaluated versus the ICRP 128 data. The highest and lowest doses absorbed by the kidneys were 0.48 mGy-MBq and 0.0042 mGy-MBq obtained for 4-year-old and 14-year-old children using 99mTc-DMSA and 99mTc-MAG3 radiopharmaceuticals, respectively. Moreover, in these cases, the relative errors of simulation results compared to the reference ICRP data were 12.1% and 0.95%, respectively. The simulation results were in good agreement with the ICRP 128 data. The results showed that the highest absorbed dose was by kidneys and when 99mTc-DMSA was used. The highest and lowest absorbed dose in the organs occurs when 99mTc-DMSA and 99mTc-MAG3 (in normal renal function) are used, respectively. On the other hand, the results indicated that the dose received by the organs decreases with age.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.