Paper detail

Monte Carlo Approaches for Simulating a Particle at a Diffusivity Interface and the "Ito--Stratonovich Dilemma"

The possibility of different interpretations of the stochastic term (or calculi) in the overdamped Langevin equation for the motion of a particle in an inhomogeneous medium is often referred to as the "Ito--Stratonovich dilemma," although there is, in fact, a continuum of choices. We introduce two Monte Carlo (MC) simulation approaches for studying such systems, with both approaches giving the choice between different calculi (in particular, Ito, Stratonovich, and "isothermal"). To demonstrate these approaches, we study the diffusion on a 1D interval of a particle released at an interface (in the middle of the system) between two media where this particle has different diffusivities (e.g., two fluids with different viscosities). For reflecting boundary conditions at the ends of the interval, a discontinuity at the interface in the stationary-state particle distribution is found, except for the isothermal case, as expected. We also study the first-passage problem using absorbing boundary conditions. Good agreement is found when comparing the MC approaches to theory as well as Brownian and Langevin dynamics simulations. Also, the results themselves turn out to be interesting. For instance: 1) for some calculi, there are more particles on the low-viscosity side (LVS) at earlier times and then fewer particles at later times; 2) there is no preference to end up on a particular wall for the Ito variant, but a bias towards the wall on the LVS in all other cases; 3) the mean first-passage time to the wall on the LVS grows as the viscosity on the other side is increased, except for the isothermal case where it approaches a constant; 4) when the viscosity ratio is high, the first-passage-time distribution for the wall on the LVS is much broader than for the other wall, with a power-law dependence of the former in a certain time interval whose exponent depends on the calculus.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.