Paper detail

Monotone Splines Lasso

We consider the problems of variable selection and estimation in nonparametric additive regression models for high-dimensional data. In recent years, several methods have been proposed to model nonlinear relationships when the number of covariates exceeds the number of observations by using spline basis functions and group penalties. Nonlinear {\it monotone} effects on the response play a central role in many situations, in particular in medicine and biology. We construct the monotone splines lasso (MS-lasso) to select variables and estimate effects using monotone spline (I-splines). The additive components in the model are represented by their I-spline basis function expansion and the component selection becomes that of selecting the groups of coefficients in the I-spline basis function expansion. We use a recent procedure, called cooperative lasso, to select sign-coherent groups, that is selecting the groups with either exclusively non-negative or non-positive coefficients. This leads to the selection of important covariates that have nonlinear monotone increasing or decreasing effect on the response. We also introduce an adaptive version of the MS-lasso which reduces both the bias and the number of false positive selections considerably. We compare the MS-lasso and the adaptive MS-lasso with other existing methods for variable selection in high dimensions by simulation and illustrate the method on two relevant genomic data sets. Results indicate that the (adaptive) MS-lasso has excellent properties compared to the other methods both by means of estimation and selection, and can be recommended for high-dimensional monotone regression.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.