Paper detail

Monitoring strong coupling in nonlocal plasmonics with electron spectroscopies

Plasmon-exciton polaritons provide exciting possibilities to control light-matter interactions at the nanoscale by enabling closer investigation of quantum optical effects and facilitating novel technologies based, for instance, on Bose-Einstein condensation and polaritonic lasing. Nevertheless, observing and visualising polaritons is challenging, and traditional optical microscopy techniques often lead to ambiguities regarding the emergence and strength of the plasmon-exciton coupling. Electron microscopy offers a more robust means to study and verify the nature of plexcitons, but is still hindered by instrument limitations and resolution. A simple theoretical description of electron beam-excited plexcitons is therefore vital to complement ongoing experimental efforts. Here we apply analytic solutions for the electron-loss and photon-emission probabilities to evaluate plasmon-exciton coupling studied either with the recently adopted technique of electron energy-loss spectroscopy, or with the so-far unexplored in this context cathodoluminescence spectroscopy. Foreseeing the necessity to account for quantum corrections in the plasmonic response, we extend these solutions within the framework of general nonlocal hydrodynamic descriptions. As a specific example we study core-shell spherical emitter-molecule hybrids, going beyond the standard local-response approximation through the hydrodynamic Drude model for screening and the generalised nonlocal optical response theory for nonlocal damping. We show that electron microscopies are extremely powerful in describing the interaction of emitters with the otherwise weakly excited by optical means higher-order plasmonic multipoles, a response that survives when quantum-informed models are considered.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.