Paper detail

Momentum structure of the self-energy and its parametrization for the two-dimensional Hubbard model

We compute the self-energy for the half-filled Hubbard model on a square lattice using lattice quantum Monte Carlo simulations and the dynamical vertex approximation. The self-energy is strongly momentum dependent, but it can be parametrized via the non-interacting energy-momentum dispersion $\varepsilon_{\mathbf{k}}$, except for pseudogap features right at the Fermi edge. That is, it can be written as $Σ(\varepsilon_{\mathbf{k}},ω)$, with two energy-like parameters ($\varepsilon$, $ω$) instead of three ($k_x$, $k_y$ and $ω$). The self-energy has two rather broad and weakly dispersing high energy features and a sharp $ω= \varepsilon_{\mathbf{k}}$ feature at high temperatures, which turns to $ω= -\varepsilon_{\mathbf{k}}$ at low temperatures. Altogether this yields a Z- and reversed-Z-like structure, respectively, for the imaginary part of $Σ(\varepsilon_{\mathbf{k}},ω)$. We attribute the change of the low energy structure to antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.