Paper detail

Momentum and Energy Dependent Resolution Function of the ARCS Neutron Chopper Spectrometer at High Momentum Transfer: Comparing Simulation and Experimen

Inelastic neutron scattering at high momentum transfers (i.e. $Q\ge20$ Å) or DINS provides direct observation of the momentum distribution of light atoms, making it a powerful probe for studying single-particle motions in liquids and solids. The quantitative analysis of DINS data requires an accurate knowledge of the instrument resolution function $R_{i}({Q},E)$ at each $Q$ and energy transfer $E$, where the label $i$ indicates whether the resolution was experimentally observed $i={obs}$ or simulated $i=sim$. Here, we describe two independent methods for determining the total resolution function $R_{i}({Q},E)$ of the ARCS neutron instrument at the Spallation Neutron Source, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The first method uses experimental data from an archetypical system (liquid $^4$He) studied with DINS, which are then numerically deconvoluted using its previously determined intrinsic scattering function to yield $R_{obs}({Q},E)$. The second approach uses accurate Monte Carlo simulations of the ARCS spectrometer, which account for all instrument contributions, coupled to a representative scattering kernel to reproduce the experimentally observed response $S({Q},E)$. Using a delta function as scattering kernel, the simulation yields a resolution function $R_{sim}({Q},E)$ with comparable lineshape and features as $R_{obs}({Q},E)$, but somewhat narrower due to the ideal nature of the model. Using each of these two $R_{i}({Q},E)$ separately, we extract characteristic parameters of liquid $^4$He such as the intrinsic linewidth $α_2$ (which sets the atomic kinetic energy $\langle K\rangle\simα_2$) in the normal liquid and the Bose-Einstein condensate parameter $n_0$ in the superfluid phase. The extracted $α_2$ values agree well with previous measurements, independently of which $R_i(Q,y)$ is used to analyze the data.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.