Paper detail

Modified Bivariate Weibull Distribution Allowing Instantaneous and Early Failures

In reliability and life data analysis, the Weibull distribution is widely used to accommodate more data characteristics by changing the values of the parameters. We frequently observe many zeros or close to zero data points in reliability and life testing experiments. We call this phenomenon a nearly instantaneous failure. Many researchers modified the commonly used univariate parametric models such as exponential, gamma, Weibull, and log-normal distributions to appropriately fit such data having instantaneous failure observations. Researchers also find bivariate correlated life testing data having many observations near a particular point while the remaining observations follow some continuous distribution. This situation defines as responses having early failures for such bivariate responses. If the point is the origin, then we call the situation a nearly instantaneous failure for the responses. Here, we propose a modified bivariate Weibull distribution that allows early failure by combining bivariate uniform distribution and bivariate Weibull distribution. The bivariate Weibull distribution is constructed using a 2-dimensional copula, assuming the marginal distributions as two parametric Weibull distributions. We derive some properties of that modified bivariate Weibull distribution, mainly the joint probability density function, the survival (reliability) function, and the hazard (failure rate) function. The model's unknown parameters are estimated using the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) technique combined with a machine learning clustering algorithm. Numerical examples are provided using simulated data to illustrate and test the performance of the proposed methodologies. The method is also applied to real data and compared with existing approaches to model such data in the literature.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.