Paper detail

Modifications of Wald's score tests on large dimensional covariance matrices structure

This paper considers testing the covariance matrices structure based on Wald's score test in large dimensional setting. The hypothesis $H_0: Σ=Σ_0 $ for a given matrix $Σ_0$, which covers the identity hypothesis test and sphericity hypothesis test as the special cases, is reviewed by the generalized CLT (Central Limit Theorem) for the linear spectral statistics of large dimensional sample covariance matrices from Jiang(2015) . The proposed tests can be applicable for large dimensional non-Gaussian variables in a wider range. Furthermore, the simulation study is provided to compare the proposed tests with other large dimensional covariance matrix tests for evaluation of their performances. As seen from the simulation results, our proposed tests are feasible for large dimensional data without restriction of population distribution and provide the accurate and steady empirical sizes, which are almost around the nominal size.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.