Paper detail

Moderate-Dimensional Inferences on Quadratic Functionals in Ordinary Least Squares

Statistical inferences for quadratic functionals of linear regression parameter have found wide applications including signal detection, global testing, inferences of error variance and fraction of variance explained. Classical theory based on ordinary least squares estimator works perfectly in the low-dimensional regime, but fails when the parameter dimension $p_n$ grows proportionally to the sample size $n$. In some cases, its performance is not satisfactory even when $n\ge 5p_n$. The main contribution of this paper is to develop {\em dimension-adaptive} inferences for quadratic functionals when $\lim_{n\to \infty} p_n/n=τ\in[0,1)$. We propose a bias-and-variance-corrected test statistic and demonstrate that its theoretical validity (such as consistency and asymptotic normality) is adaptive to both low dimension with $τ= 0$ and moderate dimension with $τ\in(0, 1)$. Our general theory holds, in particular, without Gaussian design/error or structural parameter assumption, and applies to a broad class of quadratic functionals covering all aforementioned applications. As a by-product, we find that the classical fixed-dimensional results continue to hold {\em if and only if} the signal-to-noise ratio is large enough, say when $p_n$ diverges but slower than $n$. Extensive numerical results demonstrate the satisfactory performance of the proposed methodology even when $p_n\ge 0.9n$ in some extreme cases. The mathematical arguments are based on the random matrix theory and leave-one-observation-out method.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.