Paper detail

Modelling Time-varying Dark Energy with Constraints from Latest Observations

We introduce a set of two-parameter models for the dark energy equation of state (EOS) $w(z)$ to investigate time-varying dark energy. The models are classified into two types according to their boundary behaviors at the redshift $z=(0,\infty)$ and their local extremum properties. A joint analysis based on four observations (SNe + BAO + CMB + $H_0$) is carried out to constrain all the models. It is shown that all models get almost the same $χ^2_{min}\simeq 469$ and the cosmological parameters $(Ω_M, h, Ω_bh^2)$ with the best-fit results $(0.28, 0.70, 2.24)$, although the constraint results on two parameters $(w_0, w_1)$ and the allowed regions for the EOS $w(z)$ are sensitive to different models and a given extra model parameter. For three of Type I models which have similar functional behaviors with the so-called CPL model, the constrained two parameters $w_0$ and $w_1$ have negative correlation and are compatible with the ones in CPL model, and the allowed regions of $w(z)$ get a narrow node at $z\sim 0.2$. The best-fit results from the most stringent constraints in Model Ia give $(w_0,w_1) = (-0.96^{+0.26}_{-0.21}, -0.12^{+0.61}_{-0.89})$ which may compare with the best-fit results $(w_0,w_1) = (-0.97^{+0.22}_{-0.18}, -0.15^{+0.85}_{-1.33})$ in the CPL model. For four of Type II models which have logarithmic function forms and an extremum point, the allowed regions of $w(z)$ are found to be sensitive to different models and a given extra parameter. It is interesting to obtain two models in which two parameters $w_0$ and $w_1$ are strongly correlative and appropriately reduced to one parameter by a linear relation $w_1 \propto (1+w_0)$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.