Paper detail

Modeling the magnetoresistance vs. field curves of GMR multilayers with antiferromagnetic and/or orthogonal coupling by assuming single-domain state and coherent rotation

In order to better understand the role of possible couplings in determining the giant magnetoresistance (GMR) behavior of multilayers, a knowledge of the dependence of the $GMR$ on magnetic field $H$ appears to be useful. Since a few specific cases have only been treated theoretically in the literature, it was decided to carry out a modeling of the $GMR(H)$ curves of ferromagnetic/non-magnetic (FM/NM) multilayers with various interlayer couplings. For simplicity, we focused on a trilayer structure (FM1/NM/FM2) corresponding fairly well to the case of a large number of FM/NM bilayers. To carry out the calculations, some fundamental assumptions were made: (i) single domain FM layer, in plane magnetization; (ii) the magnetization of each layer is the same; (iii) the magnetization vectors rotate in the plane of the layers in an external magnetic field. In order to calculate the $GMR(H)$ function, we need to know the magnetization process in the trilayer, i.e., the $M(H)$ function. Therefore, first we calculate the equilibrium angle $ϕ(H)$ between the two magnetization vectors as a function of the field by minimizing the total energy of the trilayer. According to most previous theoretical and experimental works, the angular dependence of the GMR is fairly well described by the relation $GMR(ϕ)\propto (1-\cosϕ)$ and we used this relation to derive the $GMR(H)$ function. Along this line, the $M(H)$ and $GMR(H)$ curves were calculated for the following cases: (i) pure AF coupling; (ii) pure orthogonal coupling; (iii) AF coupling and orthogonal coupling simultaneously present. As to the calculation of the $GMR(H)$ curves, some of these configurations have not yet been treated formerly or for some specific parameter values only. For those cases for which calculations were reported in the literature for $M(H)$ and $GMR(H)$, our results agree with previous reports.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.