Paper detail

Modeling sexual selection in Túngara frog and rationality of mate choice

The males of the specie of frogs Engystomops pustulosus produce simple and com- plex calls to lure females, as a way of Intersexual selection. Complex calls lead males to a greater reproductive success than simple calls do. However, the complex calls are also more attractive to the main predator of these amphibians, the bat Trachops cirrhosus. Therefore, as M. Ryan suggests, the complexity of the calls let the frogs keep a trade off between reproductive success and predation. In this paper, we first propose to model the proportion of simple to complex calls as a symmetric game of two strategies. We also propose a model with three strategies (simple callers, complex callers and quiet males), where we assess the effect of a male that keeps quiet and intercepts females, which would play a role of Intrasexual selection. We analyze the stable points of the replicator equations of the models that we propose. Under the assumption that the decision of the males takes into account this trade off between reproductive success and predation, our model reproduces the observed behavior reported in the literature with minimal assumption on the parameters. From the three strategies model, we verify that the quiet strategy could only coexists with the simple and complex strategies as long as the rate at which quiet males intercept females is high. We conclude that the reproductive strategy of the male frog Engystomops pustulosus is rational.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.